What Dr. Ahmed Kadhem Al-Bahadely Tend in from the Fundamental Opinions in the introductions of his Book Muftah Alwossu to Fundamentals Science in Question of ( The Book of Glory ( Alkitab Almajeed )
Keywords:
intend to , Dr. Bahadli , introductions , Glorious bookAbstract
Sheikh Dr. Ahmed Al-Bahadli set out in the introductions to his book (The Key to Access to the Science of Fundamentals) to clarify some of the issues of fundamentalism and jurisprudence, which he saw as one of the necessities of those introductions. The doctor has some issues and opinions related to the Glorious Book, and here are the fundamentalist opinions he tended to in these matters.
Sheikh Dr. Ahmed Al-Bahadli mentioned some issues and opinions related to the Glorious Book, as he mentioned what is related to the wording of the Book, the intelligible, the uttered, the truth, the metaphor, the abrogator, the abrogated, the common, the command and the prohibition, the general and specific, and other issues that he saw related to the study of the Holy Book. It is considered by the reference of the evidence and the source of the sources, so it is obvious that he should refer to it when he wants to know the legal ruling. If the ruling is not found in it, it is necessary to refer to the Sunnah, and that is because the Sunnah clarifies the Book, and explains its meanings, and from here we find that Sheikh Dr. And as for the Sunnah, it is because it is issued by the infallible Prophet who does not speak out of whim, for he is a revelation that is revealed.
Dr. Ahmed Kazem Al-Bahadli’s dedication to cultural and scientific books and their collection, reflected positively and clearly on his personality and his science. He took a methodology of his own and followed it, and he saw that it is useful and necessary for students of science. There are two main approaches: a fixed approach and a variable approach, and he declared in the introduction to his book this methodology by saying: “When I want to write in this science, I do not want to follow this approach except in terms of breadth and comprehensiveness and not in depth.
