The evidence that indicate to the omitted accusative to the object with Al Radhi in explaining the adequacy

Abstract

The research is an analytical study to demonstrate the validity of the assessment of the omitted accusative to the object, The assessment represents two aspects: the first is the grammatical estimation, which  reformulates the structure with what grammatical validity is held within the rules of grammatical attribution, so the most important thing in this assessment is the statement of the elements of the attribution that it is better to remain silent on, and the other side is the assessment of the meaning, which is wider than the statement of the elements of attribution.  This assessment aims to understand the structure through the meaning of the speech, and all these estimation issues were taken  in the light of the verbal and current evidence in the book of Sharh AlRadi on AlKafiya'a,so the two evidence reoresent the method that determin assesment . So no estimation without evidence because it is a kind of unseen  according to what the grammarians wrote about Ibn Jinni, and on the other side, the research represents an applied presentation of the most important regulations  adopted by Al-Radi Al-Istrabadi in taking  the assessment according to the two presumptions in light of the verbal and current clues in the book Sharh Al-Radhi on the adequacy, and it presents the principles that Al-Radhi adopted in observing the appreciation according to the two evidence, and the research represents a study of the explanation of Al-Radhi Al-Asturabadi for the phrase of Ibn Al-Hajib in his book Al-Kifiyya in grammar and the phrase   is (the verb may be omitted because of a prescription, as permissible as your saying to someone who said: I do not strike, and it is obligatory in four places: the first, audible like: a person and himself, and “end well for you” and “Welcome ). As this phrase represents the scientific material from which the research select the writing of the details of the research, and the research. The research discussed the obligatory ruling in which he described  Speech by the audible, and Al-Radi attributed the rule of obligation to the reason for frequent use, and the research came out with some results, including that describing audiovisuals with the rule of obligation cannot be said about its release, so it is permissible, and also the research showed that the verbal presumption based on presenting the question and the answer to indicate what is omitted can be counted  Current clues  not the verbal