Evaluating the job performance of career education institutions in light of the death of Covid 19 A field social study at the University of Babylon
Keywords:
evaluation, performance, job, educational institution, Babylon UniversityAbstract
The problem of this research revolves around the main question: Are job performance evaluation levels for employees at Babylon University and its affiliated departments approved? Based on this question, the importance of the research emerges in clarifying the importance of evaluating job performance in light of the exacerbation of the Corona crisis, because the job performance evaluation system is one of the important topics for all institutions that require attention to human resources as a basic determinant of the success or failure of institutions, especially in light of the spread of the Corona crisis.
In order to achieve the importance of the research, the research objective is based on determining the levels of job performance evaluation in the educational institution, as well as clarifying the dimensions of the impact of the Corona pandemic on the level of job performance evaluation for employees.
Based on the achievement of the research objectives, (50) electronic questionnaire forms were distributed to a simple random sample of Babylon University employees, and the social survey method was relied upon to identify and treat research variables, and for the purpose of analyzing the questionnaire responses, the researchers used a number of statistical methods such as: percentage , mean, standard deviation, and chi-square test.
Among the most important results of this research were:
- The data showed that (78%) are males, and (22%) are females, and the data also showed that the largest age group was between (40-46) years, with a percentage of (30%), and the lowest age group was between (54) - 60 years at a rate of (4%).
- The data showed that (48%) believe that the Corona pandemic period is insufficient to evaluate job performance, and that (28%) sometimes see the pandemic as sufficient to evaluate performance, and (24%) consider it sufficient to evaluate job performance.
- The data showed a statistically significant relationship between the respondents’ answers, if the value of the chi-square (8,269) is smaller than the tabular value (7,815), and with a degree of freedom (3), and at a confidence level (95%), so we accept the research hypothesis and reject the hypothesis The morphological that says (there is no relationship between marital status and the social problems they faced at work during the pandemic period).
- The data showed that 58% of the respondents were married, 18% were divorced, 16% were single, 8% were widows, 72% were living in urban areas, while 28% were living in rural areas.
- Smaller data showed no statistically significant moral relationship between the respondents' answers, if the value of the Kay box (1,806), was of table value (5,991), a degree of freedom (2), and a level of confidence (95%), so we reject the search hypothesis and accept the pure hypothesis that the direct official divides the work between employees fairly among them during the pandemic period).
The data showed a statistically significant moral relationship between the respondents' answers, if the value of the Kay box (8,269), was smaller than the scheduled value (7,815), with a degree of freedom (3), and a level of confidence (95%), so we accept the search hypothesis and reject the pure hypothesis that says (there is no relationship between marital status and social problems they faced at work during the pandemic period