News and construction according to the late scholars of the principles of Imamiyyah

Abstract

              The research presented the opinion of the later fundamentalists regarding predicate and construction. The importance of the research comes from its connection to important semantic issues, such as commands, prohibitions, and others, because their goal behind this is to diagnose the legal ruling. So they discussed constructional methods in the introduction to their fundamentalist books. They discussed the declarative sentence in a manner similar to rhetorical research, but they differed from the rhetoricians in the trends. Among them is that the constructive sentence finds its meaning and the declarative sentence tells about it. The declarative sentence, according to them, is created to establish or not establish the relation outside, while the constructive sentences are created to find the meaning outside, which is expressed by the constructive presence, meaning the sentence has the meaning outside when it is uttered, or as the investigator goes. Al-Khurasani states that the difference between the two sentences of predicate and construction is the intention or the motive, and this is close to the theory of the Western philosopher (John Austin) in his book (The Theory of Speech Acts), who was born in the same year in which Al-Muhaqqiq Al-Khurasani died.

Through this research, a group of important theories emerged for us in interpreting the predicate and construction of the late fundamentalists, which today is considered at the core of the modern linguistic lesson. This was the goal of the research, as these theories were presented using the descriptive and analytical research method.