Experimental categories (furnishing - communication - readiness) Read reviews In the book Aesthetics of Narrative Experimentation By Dr. Jassim Khalaf Elias


  • Jaafar Ahmed Abdullah The Open Educational College / Nineveh Center Nineveh Directorate of Education


furnishing, experimentation, readiness, communication


The differentiation between the storyteller and the critic comes through sensing the written pleasure between the two, and the extent of the critic's judgment and interaction with the narrative material. Little rush or even monetary courtesy. On the contrary, the critic employed all the assumptions and interpretations with his monetary tools, and checked the criticism that preceded him about what was written about the storyteller Mahmoud Jandari. He was speaking with a constructive strategy, and an undoubted evaluation measure. To areas of the storyteller's imagination, and this matter requires experience, accuracy, and scrutiny, and criticism remains the decisive point in judging the text read in examining the superstructure (criticism and the critic) and the substructure (the narrator and what is behind his story) at a moment of permanent clash and process.The research was divided into several axes that came connected and sequentially in a successive manner, and they are on axes: a procedural thalamus dealing with the authority of experimentation, experimentation and penetration of proofs, then the statements followed as follows:The first argument: the strategy of critical writing. The argument included the objective critical culture / methodological grading. The focus of the argument was: the critic is a starting point towards the truth, and the critic and the concept of aesthetic sniping.The second argument: idiomatic excavations confronting the text. The critic's realistic expressive saying included the stream of consciousness, the internal monologue, the free association, the dream, the vision, and the soliloquy.The third argument: Critical ingenuity and the dynamism of communication. The argument included criticism of the term, criticism of the critic, and deconstruction of the gender text according to a specialized critical mechanism.The fourth argument: title interaction / parallelism and communication; The headlines had psychological dimensions that paralleled and connected with the rest of the headlines in an invisible fabric.