The role of semantic relationships in lexical accessibility

Authors

  • Rozhgar Rifaat obeed University of Kirkuk , college of Education ,Department of Kurdish language
  • Sirwan Samin Ahmed University of Kirkuk , college of Education ,Department of Kurdish language

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66026/7kjgfn70

Keywords:

: semantic, relations , Lexical access, Semantic, memory

Abstract

The study of semantic relationships and their organization within human “Semantic Memory” stands as a vital subject in the fields of psycholinguistics and semantics. The human brain does not process or store words as isolated, randomly placed entities; rather, it structures them within interconnected “semantic networks.” This organization directly influences the mechanism and speed of “Lexical Access.” Consequently, this research stems from a fundamental inquiry: How does the mental organization of words—specifically through Synonymy, Polysemy, and Homonymy—affect a speaker’s capacity for swift and accurate word retrieval? This study gains particular significance by highlighting the cognitive distinctions between monolingual and bilingual speakers. Contemporary literature and recent empirical research indicate that bilingual individuals possess an “Integrated Semantic Memory” system. This implies that exposure to a lexical item in one language does not exclusively activate its meanings within that specific language; rather, it automatically triggers the corresponding semantic networks and translation equivalents in the other language(s) the speaker commands. Furthermore, this research examines how certain semantic relationships can facilitate lexical access. For instance, “synonyms”—particularly “cognates” that share both semantic and phonological similarities across languages—can pool cognitive resources to accelerate the retrieval and articulation process. Conversely, the study elucidates how “polysemy” (words with multiple related senses) and “homonymy” (words identical in form but with completely unrelated meanings) can pose cognitive challenges and barriers. In such instances, multiple competing meanings are simultaneously activated in the brain, demanding additional time and cognitive effort to “suppress” the non-target meanings in order to isolate the intended target word and its appropriate context.

References

Downloads

Published

2026-10-23