Shortcomings in the Civil Regulation of Investment Residential Complex Management in Iraq: A Study in Light of the Provisions on Common Ownership

Authors

  • Hammam Mohammed Yaqoub College of Law / University of Al-Hamdaniya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66026/0mpzmk38

Keywords:

Investment Residential Complexes, Owners' Association, Contracts of Adhesion, Mandatory Real Estate Registration, Iraqi Investment Law No. (13) of 2006.

Abstract

This study addresses the issue of the management of investment residential complexes in Iraq, arising from the inadequacy of the Iraqi Civil Code to accommodate the legal nature of vertical housing, thereby granting investors extensive administrative powers through contracts of adhesion. Employing an analytical approach, the study aims to identify the gap between the existing legislative framework and its practical application in safeguarding the rights of property owners.

The study concludes that the continued reliance on traditional legal rules undermines the effective collective management of residential complexes. It therefore recommends the enactment of a Law on Owners' Associations, granting such associations legal personality and enforceable legal authority. Furthermore, it advocates the mandatory registration of residential units in the Real Estate Registry as a binding investment obligation, with a view to ensuring legal certainty and the stability of legal positions. The study addresses a legislative gap within the Iraqi legal system regarding the modern phenomenon of vertical housing. Relationships between investors and residents in investment-based residential complexes are currently governed by provisions concerning "common ownership" (co-ownership) found in the Iraqi Civil Code—provisions originally designed for traditional, temporary co-ownership scenarios and ill-suited to the nature of the permanent, mandatory co-ownership inherent in such complexes. This inadequate legal classification has spawned structural disputes concerning the management of common areas and the imposition of service fees; investors exercise absolute administrative authority rooted in contracts of adhesion that cement their dominance, while residents—despite being owners—are unable to exercise their rights to collective management due to the lack of a legal framework establishing a homeowners' association with legal personality and enforcement powers. Consequently, the resident's legal standing is held hostage to the investor's will, undermining the stability of administrative and financial dealings within these complexes. The study employs a descriptive-analytical approach, describing applicable legal provisions and judicial rulings, followed by a critical analysis to highlight their shortcomings.

References

Downloads

Published

2026-10-09