Administrative Law Regimes in Nigeria, Iraq, and Malaysia: A Comparative Analysis through the Lens of International Human Rights Law

Abstract

This comparative study examines the administrative law regimes in Nigeria, Iraq, and Malaysia, with a focus on their legal frameworks, institutions, and practices as well as their compliance with human rights and international law standards. The research aims to identify the convergences and divergences in the administrative law regimes of these three countries, and to explore the implications of these similarities and differences for governance, rule of law, and human rights. By analyzing the legislative, judicial, and administrative frameworks of each country, this study provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each regime, and offers recommendations for reform and improvement. The comparative approach adopted in this research provides a unique perspective on the complexities of administrative law in diverse legal and cultural contexts, and contributes to the ongoing debate on the role of administrative law in promoting good governance and human rights.