An analytical study of historical narratives

Authors

  • Haider Amer Al-Sultani University of Babylon / Babylon Center for Cultural and Historical Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66026/0z42w236

Keywords:

Critique of Historical Narratives, Nursing of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), Refusal of Polytheistic Wet Nurses, Delegation of Wet Nurses, Divine Guidance in Nursing, Nursing by a Monotheist, Protection from Assassination.

Abstract

            In this research, we adopted an academic and rational methodology to scrutinize the historical narratives related to the nursing of Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him and His Progeny). We raised fundamental questions regarding the authenticity of the narrations concerning the Prophet's nursing, evaluating them against the standards of reason, logic, and Quranic texts. Furthermore, we sought to deconstruct, analyze, and critique the accounts claiming that the Prophet (PBUH) was nursed by a polytheistic woman, that the arrival of Halima Al-Saadia and her people was merely a coincidence or an annual custom to seek wages, as well as the true motives behind sending the Prophet (PBUH) to the desert.                                                                                                                     

The study concluded by rejecting the narratives asserting that the women of Bani Saad routinely came to the honored city of Mecca as an annual custom to seek children for wages. We questioned how women enduring a severe drought—which had dried up the udders of their livestock and their own breasts, leaving them unable to satiate their own children's hunger—could possibly possess the capacity to nurse the affluent children of Mecca. We deduced that the Bani Saad tribe were the ones who came to Mecca seeking someone to save them from their severe destitution, and they consequently attained satiety and abundance through the blessings of the Prophet (PBUH). We also noted that the narratives extensively detailed trivial and insignificant aspects of the wet nurses' journey, such as the names and ages of animals, while it is logically implausible to reject a child whose guardian was the master of Quraysh, possessing immense wealth and a prestigious status.                            

Moreover, we concluded that the practice of sending children to the deserts to acquire eloquence was not a widespread or general custom among all the nobles of Quraysh prior to Abdul Muttalib sending his grandson to the Bani Saad desert. We substantiated this by the absence of historical evidence proving that Abdul Muttalib, Abu Talib, or other elites of Mecca sent the rest of their children to the deserts for nursing. We argued that the primary motive for moving the Prophet (PBUH) to the territory of Bani Saad was to provide him with security and protect him from assassination attempts orchestrated by his enemies (such as some factions of Jews and Christians) who recognized the signs of his birth and prophethood. The desert provided a secure environment and a safe haven away from potential threats.                                                        

Finally, we reached the conclusion that the Prophet (PBUH) never nursed from a polytheistic woman. He refused to nurse from all the Meccan women presented to him (estimated to be sixty-four, not 460 as some exaggerated narratives claim). Relying on specific accounts, we demonstrated that Abdul Muttalib, after becoming distressed by his grandson's refusal to nurse, was advised to entrust him to Halima Al-Saadia, owing to her descent from a noble lineage connected to Prophet Abraham (Peace Be Upon Him).                                     

References

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15