Preference based on the chain of transmission among jurists, and its impact on some matters of worship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66026/mdn40m22Keywords:
conflict and weighting, bond, matters of worship.Abstract
This research aims to identify weighting as the bond of scholars and its impact on certain issues of worship, as one of the important models in the demonstration of weighting rules that contribute to eliminating apparent inconsistencies between sharia texts and this research is based on descriptive and analytical study, by tracking the definition of weighting language and terminology in addition to clarifying the relationship between conflict and weighting and then check the weighting rules, considering the bond and its applications in worship, for (Narrator - Narrator - Narrator - Narrator). One of the main findings of the research was that the door to conflict and weighting is one of the most important and accurate parts of the science of the origins of jurisprudence and jurisprudence. Its importance is increased in relation to the evidence of legal judgments, which are transmitted and reasonable. The weighting of the many narrators, the weighting of the narrator's jurisprudence, and the weighting rules of the novel that have had a significant impact on matters of worship: The weighting agreed to lift it, and one of the weighting rules of the irrigator that has had a significant impact on matters of worship: weighting by verbally narrated talk on the irrigated meaning.
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal Of Babylon Center for Humanities Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


