The effect of Qur’anic readings on the multiple meanings of jurisprudence

Abstract

This research addresses an important topic, centered on shedding light on the various readings of the words of the Holy Quran, demonstrating their profound impact on the diversity of the true meanings of Quranic texts and their role in causing jurisprudential differences among scholars. Quranic readings represent a fertile field for studying textual pluralism, which has influenced the derivation of Islamic rulings and the formation of various schools of jurisprudence.

The research focuses on defining Quranic readings and explaining their role in influencing jurisprudential rulings, reviewing their importance in deepening the understanding of Islamic texts. The research also examines multiple readings according to various approaches of schools of jurisprudential readings, highlighting their contribution to enriching Islamic thought and expanding the scope of jurisprudential pluralism.

The importance of this research lies in its approach to addressing the issue of jurisprudential differences resulting from multiple Quranic readings from a perspective that promotes diversity and highlights the value of pluralism, rather than focusing on disagreement and conflict. Here, differences are not a source of division, but rather a means of demonstrating the richness of Islamic law and its ability to accommodate diverse opinions and interpretations. The researcher adopted a descriptive and analytical approach to studying Quranic readings, tracing these readings and explaining the reasons for disagreement among scholars, while clarifying the jurisprudential impact of each reading. The research seeks to present a clear understanding of the connection between the diversity of Quranic readings and the multiplicity of jurisprudential opinions, thus enhancing our understanding of Islam as a religion that encourages scholarly dialogue and coexistence among diverse viewpoints.