Interpretation between stagnation and renewal: a study of intellectual principles and cognitive objectives

Abstract

                This study addresses a central problem in the field of Qur'anic studies: the debate between "stagnation" and "renewal" in Qur'anic interpretation. The research aims to analyze these two concepts and uncover the nature of the "intellectual premises" and "epistemological objectives" that are crucial factors in guiding the interpreter's approach toward one side or the other. The study employs an integrated methodology combining descriptive, analytical, critical, and comparative approaches. The research concludes that the interpreter's intellectual premises (whether doctrinal, sectarian, or methodological) constitute the underlying framework that guides their understanding, and that the epistemic objectives they pursue (whether explanatory, legislative, or reformist) determine the goal of the interpretive process. Furthermore, the study concludes that the relationship between these premises and objectives is reciprocal; closed premises and limited objectives lead to stagnation, while open premises and objectives grounded in reality encourage disciplined renewal.  In light of this, the most prominent modern interpretive trends were evaluated, revealing their contribution to the renewal of interpretive thought. However, some of these trends have fallen into new forms of stagnation or deviation from established principles. The study recommends strengthening critical awareness of the premises and objectives of interpretation, and activating integrated interpretive methodologies to ensure the Holy Qur'an remains a living and effective source of guidance for all times and places.