Defects of rhyme among Moroccan critics

Abstract

This research aims to show the most prominent defects of rhyme addressed by the lesson of the presentations in the Arab Morocco when the ancients and moderns, with the details of the most important views of the presentations when their critics, as the impact of the critical lesson on the multiplicity of poetic arts in the Arab Morocco by restricting poets controls Khalili presentations, this is what contributed to maintaining the Khalili template for the rules of performances. The research also showed the impact of each defect on the poem and what can be tolerated within it, as the Moroccan critics preferred to show the rank of each defect in terms of acceptance and non-acceptance, inspired by the opinion of the Eastern school most likely in terms of the presence of the poetic witness in support of the base of the presentation, as the research showed the emergence of poetic art is (necessities) when Moroccan poets and how to address their critics performances of this art.

After examining the defects of rhyme among ancient and modern Moroccans, we find that the general poetic taste is the criterion in judging the acceptability of the defect or not among them. The confusion that occurred between the meters in the poetic evidence adopted by Moroccans, in turn led to the abundance of critical opinions; due to the change in rhyme and the confusion of its judgment between good and bad.