The mind between heritage and modernity and the conflict of curricula In Muhammad Sabila, there is a way

Abstract

“        Muhammad Sabila” employs for us the categories of the modern mind in its evolutionary aspect, working to find a scientific and realistic way out of the wide transitions taking place in the global astronomy in the public space, by assembling the generational mentality from a stereotypical mentality and transferring it to a more analytical mentality that can go beyond the familiar and conventional, In an elitist language that makes the intellectual able to convey his verbal message to the recipient, then the strategic perspective of dealing according to political, social and intellectual propositions, which is the main entrance to shaping our central issues. Because modernity for him is the possibility of learning, even though entry came from the political and economic gate before the cultural one. The industrial revolution is boldness in formulating general concepts for the recipient in all its representations, linking that with the priorities of modernization and democracy for the transition to liberation, and his language carried several interpretations on the modernist and modernist side. With its various divisions, and the ongoing conflict between tradition and modernity, it will be long and boring. However, we must fall into modernity despite the individual and collective challenges and obstacles. Because heritage cannot repel the wave of modernity and its accelerating movement that has entered even into the values, sociology, and psychology aspects. Moreover, heritage has also remained a fierce defender and critic of modernity and its perceptions.

          The objective alternative, in light of all this, is systematic investigation and analysis, transcending the language of argument, and liberating the mind so that it has effective dialogue and mental techniques that enable it to transcend and balance the prevailing and restrictive reactions of the mind, even on the Western side itself, which generated several opinions among Westerners and Arabs to try to produce a language. A mentality that keeps pace with modernity and is accepted in its Arab orbit after multiple struggles. This culture was later gradually transformed into a defense that justifies cases of decline and provides compensatory alternatives that replace existing ideals. Therefore, the language of rationalization became appropriate to the theories of modern science in all fields, despite the presence of rejectionist statements. And overtaking is a crisis in itself.