The Impact of Illicit Gains on Financial Assets and Legal Transactions under Iraqi Law

Authors

  • Abbas Mansour Abadi Associate Professor, University of Tehran
  • Odai Qasim Mohammed Ridha PhD Researcher, University of Tehran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66026/f2yv8m62

Keywords:

illicit gain; financial estate; legal dispositions; Iraqi Integrity Commission and Illicit Gain Law; asset recovery and precautionary attachment.

Abstract

This study examines the impact of illicit gain on the financial estate and legal dispositions under Iraqi law, in light of the Integrity Commission and Illicit Gain Law No. (30) of 2011, as amended, and the related provisions of the Civil Code and the Penal Code. The study proceeds from a fundamental problem: illicit gain, defined as an increase disproportionate to the usual resources of the obligated person, his spouse, or his dependent children, does not only have criminal effects, but extends to the very structure of the financial estate. It introduces assets tainted with illegality and raises fundamental questions concerning the fate of legal dispositions relating to such assets and the extent to which they can be separated from lawful assets within a single estate. The study adopts a comparative analytical methodology by analyzing the relevant Iraqi legislative provisions, weighing them against doctrinal and judicial trends, and drawing limited comparisons with Egyptian and Jordanian legislation where the context so requires. The study concludes that the Iraqi legislator has adopted a legal presumption of illegality regarding increases exceeding (20%) annually. However, this regulation suffers from shortcomings in addressing the civil effects of illicit gain, particularly regarding the separation of tainted assets within a single financial estate, the fate of gratuitous dispositions and the rights of bona fide third parties, and the adequacy of tracing, attachment, and recovery mechanisms. The study recommends explicit legislative intervention to address these gaps and to balance the protection of public funds, the stability of transactions, and the protection of bona fide third parties.

References

Downloads

Published

2026-11-05