The conflict between philosophy and hadith A study of the critical position of jurists towards philosophy

Abstract

This study explores the tension that obtains between philosophical discourse and Hadith literature, focusing on anthropomorphic Hadiths as a centerpiece for philosophical debate. Philosophy primarily depends on rational proof to establish its arguments, whereas Kalam, or Islamic theology, which finds its basis in Hadith, combines reason and scriptural authority. Often enough, rational reflection deviates from Hadith texts and theological positions taken by Sunni theologians, especially on issues of anthropomorphism. The research concludes that this clash is asymmetrical. Philosophy, based on reason and absolute proofs, stands on a stronger position, while the anthropomorphic Hadiths, mostly contaminated with forgery, lies, and modifications, lack the reliability needed for intellectual debate or to refute reasoned points.

The study has been divided into three parts. The first one discusses the various philosophical views: some of them are directly related to the theological explanations of anthropomorphism, while others take different directions. The second one examines the criteria for ranking arguments in philosophy and Hadith. The third part explores why the two disciplines are criticized, particularly when they coincide and conflict.

The conflict between philosophy and hadith reflects multiple aspects of human thought. It is imperative that we work to build bridges of communication and understanding between these schools of thought, to achieve a deeper understanding of religion and beliefs, and to provide a healthy academic environment that fosters a spirit of tolerance and acceptance.