Beyond Utility: A Multi-Theoretical Analysis of Global Arms Proliferation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66026/wddgsj53Keywords:
Arms Proliferation, International Arms Transfers, Rationalism, Institutionalism, Constructivism, National Security, State Identity, Norms and Status, Sovereignty.Abstract
This article explores two influential frameworks, rationalism and institutionalism, in understanding the global spread of advanced weaponry. Traditionally, rationalist explanations have dominated the literature, emphasizing national security concerns and cost-benefit analyses to explain arms proliferation. However, this study broadens the perspective by emphasizing the importance of norms, status, and identity in shaping states' behavior regarding weapons procurement. By viewing arms transfers as social phenomena, the research reveals that military acquisitions are motivated not solely by functional needs but also by symbolic considerations. The high-tech weapons serve as markers of modernity and sovereignty, carrying significant symbolic value beyond their practical military utility. This approach emphasizes the dual influence of practical security interests and sociocultural factors in arms proliferation, demonstrating that states often pursue advanced weaponry to enhance their international standing and political legitimacy. The findings suggest that understanding global arms transfer dynamics requires an integrated approach that considers both strategic calculations and the social and normative meanings attached to military technology. Overall, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the complexities behind weapons proliferation, highlighting the importance of social symbolism alongside traditional security paradigms.
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal Of Babylon Center for Humanities Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


